※ [本文轉錄自 PC_Shopping 看板]
作者: lightwings (L) 看板: PC_Shopping
標題: [情報] NV GTX480 某網站測試
時間: Mon Feb 22 09:04:56 2010
資料來源
http://www.semiaccurate.com/2010/02/20/semiaccurate-gets-some-gtx480-scores/
全文自己連過去看，節錄重點
The GTX480 with 512 shaders running at full speed, 600Mhz or 625MHz depending
on which source, ran on average 5 percent faster than a Cypress HD5870, plus
or minus a little bit. The sources were not allowed to test the GTX470, which
is likely an admission that it will be slower than the Cypress HD5870.
There is one bright spot, and it is a very bright spot indeed. No, not the
thermal cap of the chip, but the tessellation performance in Heaven. On that
synthetic benchmark, the numbers were more than twice as fast as the Cypress
HD5870, and will likely beat a dual chip Hemlock HD5970. The sources said
that this lead was most definitely not reflected in any game or test they
ran, it was only in tessellation limited situations where the shaders don't
need to be used for 'real work'.
Update: The games tested DID include DX11 games, and those are still in the
5% range. Heaven uses tessellation in a way that games can not, Heaven can
utilize far more shaders for tessellation than a normal game can, they have
to use them for, well, the game itself. The performance of Heaven on GTX480
was not reflected in any games tested by our sources, DX9, 10, 10.1 or 11.
========
簡單來說，某人拿到GTX480來測試
結果只贏Radeon HD5870 5%而已....
--
心沒有大小 也沒有形狀
看不出形體 更稱不出重量
但
它確實會受傷
--
作者: lightwings (L) 看板: PC_Shopping
標題: [情報] NV GTX480 某網站測試
時間: Mon Feb 22 09:04:56 2010
資料來源
http://www.semiaccurate.com/2010/02/20/semiaccurate-gets-some-gtx480-scores/
全文自己連過去看，節錄重點
The GTX480 with 512 shaders running at full speed, 600Mhz or 625MHz depending
on which source, ran on average 5 percent faster than a Cypress HD5870, plus
or minus a little bit. The sources were not allowed to test the GTX470, which
is likely an admission that it will be slower than the Cypress HD5870.
There is one bright spot, and it is a very bright spot indeed. No, not the
thermal cap of the chip, but the tessellation performance in Heaven. On that
synthetic benchmark, the numbers were more than twice as fast as the Cypress
HD5870, and will likely beat a dual chip Hemlock HD5970. The sources said
that this lead was most definitely not reflected in any game or test they
ran, it was only in tessellation limited situations where the shaders don't
need to be used for 'real work'.
Update: The games tested DID include DX11 games, and those are still in the
5% range. Heaven uses tessellation in a way that games can not, Heaven can
utilize far more shaders for tessellation than a normal game can, they have
to use them for, well, the game itself. The performance of Heaven on GTX480
was not reflected in any games tested by our sources, DX9, 10, 10.1 or 11.
========
簡單來說，某人拿到GTX480來測試
結果只贏Radeon HD5870 5%而已....
--
心沒有大小 也沒有形狀
看不出形體 更稱不出重量
但
它確實會受傷
--
All Comments