來源：t.ly/nfY9
電蝦最黑暗的一年QQ~i皇新U竟然被AMD去年的二把手打敗
X皇:不建議進行跑分測試~~我說是史上最快就是史上最快
5.3G沒最快也是最熱情><
是說建議蘇媽出一個3900X不帶風扇賣487USD
樓下還不買爆~~
--------------------------
原文：Different motherboard same result: Intel Core i9-10900K chip's latest
Geekbench multi-core score still can't surpass AMD's Ryzen 9 3900X
Different motherboard same result: The Intel Core i9-10900K processor managed
to outperform the AMD Ryzen 9 3900X in the latest Geekbench 5 single-core run
unearthed by Tum Apisak but still couldn’t match the Matisse chip when it
came to the multi-core benchmark (see table below for scores). This time, the
Comet Lake part was used with an MSI Z490-S01 (MS-7C98) motherboard, whereas
in our last report on the subject there was an ASRock Z490M Pro4 board being
utilized. As the MSI Z390-A Pro had the model code 7B98 and the MSI Z370
Godlike had the model code 7A98, this MSI Z490 board could be a successor to
either of those two MSI parts.
Of course, it is worth reiterating that the Ryzen 9 3900X does have a
core-count advantage and AMD chips are known for performing at a higher level
than Intel parts in multi-core benchmarks. The Intel Core i9-10900K is a
10-core, 20-thread processor whereas the Ryzen 9 3900X has 12 cores and 24
threads. But the Comet Lake desktop processor has a higher TDP, and it has
higher clock rates and can boost to 4.8 GHz on all cores. The turbo clock for
the AMD chip is 4.6 GHz.
The 5 GHz and above clock rate will certainly be an attractive feature of the
top-end parts in Intel’s upcoming series of Comet Lake-S desktop processors,
but it will take more than that to wrench customers away from AMD’s tempting
series of Matisse CPUs if the performance is too similar (or even less) and
the price difference is too great. Newegg is currently selling the Ryzen 9
3900X for US$449.99, whereas the i9-10900K is expected to cost around US$562.
Even if Intel ignores that particular detail, there’s still the matter of AMD
’s Zen 3 Vermeer processors waiting in the wings to spoil the end of year
party for Team Blue.
--
電蝦最黑暗的一年QQ~i皇新U竟然被AMD去年的二把手打敗
X皇:不建議進行跑分測試~~我說是史上最快就是史上最快
5.3G沒最快也是最熱情><
是說建議蘇媽出一個3900X不帶風扇賣487USD
樓下還不買爆~~
--------------------------
原文：Different motherboard same result: Intel Core i9-10900K chip's latest
Geekbench multi-core score still can't surpass AMD's Ryzen 9 3900X
Different motherboard same result: The Intel Core i9-10900K processor managed
to outperform the AMD Ryzen 9 3900X in the latest Geekbench 5 single-core run
unearthed by Tum Apisak but still couldn’t match the Matisse chip when it
came to the multi-core benchmark (see table below for scores). This time, the
Comet Lake part was used with an MSI Z490-S01 (MS-7C98) motherboard, whereas
in our last report on the subject there was an ASRock Z490M Pro4 board being
utilized. As the MSI Z390-A Pro had the model code 7B98 and the MSI Z370
Godlike had the model code 7A98, this MSI Z490 board could be a successor to
either of those two MSI parts.
Of course, it is worth reiterating that the Ryzen 9 3900X does have a
core-count advantage and AMD chips are known for performing at a higher level
than Intel parts in multi-core benchmarks. The Intel Core i9-10900K is a
10-core, 20-thread processor whereas the Ryzen 9 3900X has 12 cores and 24
threads. But the Comet Lake desktop processor has a higher TDP, and it has
higher clock rates and can boost to 4.8 GHz on all cores. The turbo clock for
the AMD chip is 4.6 GHz.
The 5 GHz and above clock rate will certainly be an attractive feature of the
top-end parts in Intel’s upcoming series of Comet Lake-S desktop processors,
but it will take more than that to wrench customers away from AMD’s tempting
series of Matisse CPUs if the performance is too similar (or even less) and
the price difference is too great. Newegg is currently selling the Ryzen 9
3900X for US$449.99, whereas the i9-10900K is expected to cost around US$562.
Even if Intel ignores that particular detail, there’s still the matter of AMD
’s Zen 3 Vermeer processors waiting in the wings to spoil the end of year
party for Team Blue.
--
All Comments