AMD正式推出Radeon R9 285 "Tonga - 3C

David avatar
By David
at 2014-09-03T18:13

Table of Contents


今天AMD正式推出Radeon R9 285，基本上這是要直接替換Radeon R9 280的一款顯示卡。

其前身R9 280，即將被完全淘汰。Tonga Pro使用改進後的技術，精簡了規格，但是效能
卻與280差不多，擁有1792個串流處理器，核心時脈為918 MHz。而記憶體方面採用了
GDDR5的記憶體，支援2GB或4GB的容量運行在5500 Mhz上，記憶體頻寬為256Bit。支援
176GB/s的總頻寬 - 比前任的240GB/s的還要低。

目前Radeon R9 285 "Tonga Pro"顯示卡其預售價為249美元。

http://www.xfastest.com/thread-141878-1-1.html

等某屋

--
Tags: 3C

All Comments

Harry avatar
By Harry
at 2014-09-07T22:51
暖爐+永遠搞不定的驅動
Skylar DavisLinda avatar
By Skylar DavisLinda
at 2014-09-08T12:30
其實叫Tenga Pro比較好記
Ula avatar
By Ula
at 2014-09-08T15:35
東巴 是你?
Ursula avatar
By Ursula
at 2014-09-11T07:10
能便宜一點就好了
Zenobia avatar
By Zenobia
at 2014-09-15T10:21
叫 Tyael 好了(誤)
Belly avatar
By Belly
at 2014-09-16T13:32
原來是tenga啊 我還以為是tonga呢
Zenobia avatar
By Zenobia
at 2014-09-21T07:10
這顆晶片在效能不減下比它前代TDP降低一整截
Steve avatar
By Steve
at 2014-09-25T02:40
amd的文就會有u
Emily avatar
By Emily
at 2014-09-25T06:54
評測看起來這顆可不是暖爐
Edward Lewis avatar
By Edward Lewis
at 2014-09-27T01:07
MaxTDP才降10瓦，這樣叫降很多?
Bethany avatar
By Bethany
at 2014-09-28T21:24
拜託AMD爭氣點，不要再讓nvidia愈賣愈貴了
Delia avatar
By Delia
at 2014-10-01T05:06
我看的資料R9 280是250W, 285是190W，差了60W吧
Vanessa avatar
By Vanessa
at 2014-10-03T15:26
760是170w 285如果190w 如果價格低點是有優勢的
James avatar
By James
at 2014-10-06T23:34
280 TDP:200W 285 TDP:190W 280X TDP:250W
Edith avatar
By Edith
at 2014-10-11T13:39
285才比280降10瓦而已，根本等於沒差...
Isabella avatar
By Isabella
at 2014-10-14T05:05
280應該是250w哦
Frederica avatar
By Frederica
at 2014-10-18T15:47
techpowerup: R9-280 TDP值200w
http://ppt.cc/ffWR
Selena avatar
By Selena
at 2014-10-18T20:29
就你的資訊有誤
Zanna avatar
By Zanna
at 2014-10-21T19:51
200W才是錯的，多看幾個評測吧XD
Faithe avatar
By Faithe
at 2014-10-22T11:42
樓上才該多看幾個評測吧，被打臉還不自知...哈哈
Hedwig avatar
By Hedwig
at 2014-10-27T07:59
http://ppt.cc/tYay http://ppt.cc/RLNG
Jacky avatar
By Jacky
at 2014-10-28T21:13
http://ppt.cc/PRqA
Ophelia avatar
By Ophelia
at 2014-10-29T01:49
R9-285滿載耗電跟R9-280根本半斤八兩，差不了多少
Mia avatar
By Mia
at 2014-10-29T16:03
你說的評測咧? 千萬不要只出一張嘴喔XD
Lauren avatar
By Lauren
at 2014-10-31T08:05
上面三個網站評測已經說得很清楚了
Freda avatar
By Freda
at 2014-11-03T08:40
有需要其他網站評測來繼續打臉的話，可免費提供XDDD
Isla avatar
By Isla
at 2014-11-07T03:07
來啊來啊XD http://ppt.cc/o3ss
Robert avatar
By Robert
at 2014-11-09T10:12
R9 285 GPGPU 耗電量 191W
Frederica avatar
By Frederica
at 2014-11-14T07:47
另外就我看你提的連結, 280怎麼看都是250w...
Olivia avatar
By Olivia
at 2014-11-18T05:59
http://ppt.cc/Rcqc R9 285遊戲平均176W
Sierra Rose avatar
By Sierra Rose
at 2014-11-21T22:37
而且我強調的是280的TDP不是200W, 你這打臉有點歪..
Skylar Davis avatar
By Skylar Davis
at 2014-11-24T01:14
你要找得找同一個網站上的評測阿~
Caroline avatar
By Caroline
at 2014-11-28T20:05
那285最多只有190W喔?
Skylar Davis avatar
By Skylar Davis
at 2014-12-03T19:55
再加上CPU+RAM+SSD或HDD等等當然突破200瓦
Ursula avatar
By Ursula
at 2014-12-07T18:06
Load-Idle值才是比較正確的顯卡功耗
Andrew avatar
By Andrew
at 2014-12-08T11:07
還需要繼續打臉嗎?
XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
Skylar Davis avatar
By Skylar Davis
at 2014-12-10T10:02
你好開心喔 XD http://ppt.cc/eN-p 那這個哩?
Madame avatar
By Madame
at 2014-12-10T15:18
減下來看起來這張280是個250W
Daniel avatar
By Daniel
at 2014-12-12T01:44
看了很多評測, 很多家寫280是200W
Elvira avatar
By Elvira
at 2014-12-14T02:33
http://ppt.cc/RLNG 那這裡面的R9-285呢?Y
Mary avatar
By Mary
at 2014-12-18T16:40
大概就Tom's寫250W. 兩種瓦數也都有評測證實
R9 285的話, Tom's說他比280少了40W
Victoria avatar
By Victoria
at 2014-12-22T07:17
318W-52W = 256W
Connor avatar
By Connor
at 2014-12-26T13:18
所以285根本沒比280省電多少，這就是結論
Michael avatar
By Michael
at 2014-12-31T09:42
那你怎麼看Tom's得到的結論?
Daph Bay avatar
By Daph Bay
at 2015-01-01T23:05
Tom's的資料就保證正確? 哈哈
Oscar avatar
By Oscar
at 2015-01-02T00:35
其他網站的評測幾乎都沒少多少
Hedda avatar
By Hedda
at 2015-01-04T04:30
難道Tom's 就不會出錯? XD
Olga avatar
By Olga
at 2015-01-08T05:17
我也滿好奇的!
Sandy avatar
By Sandy
at 2015-01-12T04:07
畢竟AMD這款就是主打會比280省電
Lauren avatar
By Lauren
at 2015-01-16T04:08
或許有省一點點電，只是多數的實測結果都是相差無幾
綜合網路上多數評測就差不多是這樣
Annie avatar
By Annie
at 2015-01-17T16:57
你要選擇忽略Tom's的結果我也是沒甚麼話說啦
Erin avatar
By Erin
at 2015-01-18T19:39
的確多數測出來是相差無幾
可能Tom's撿到一張神卡吧
Brianna avatar
By Brianna
at 2015-01-20T16:12
你忽略其他好幾個網站的結果，我也是沒甚麼話說啦
Rebecca avatar
By Rebecca
at 2015-01-21T13:54
我可沒有這樣說啊 XD
Blanche avatar
By Blanche
at 2015-01-21T19:17
我可也沒有說我選擇完全忽略Tom's
Liam avatar
By Liam
at 2015-01-24T22:04
你的結論就是285根本沒比280省電多少不是 XD
Leila avatar
By Leila
at 2015-01-26T02:22
只是多數網站評測出錯的機率>>>>>>>>單一網站出錯
Eden avatar
By Eden
at 2015-01-29T20:35
打錯了
Ursula avatar
By Ursula
at 2015-01-30T10:51
是單一網站的評測出錯機率>>>>>>>>>>多數網站出錯
Franklin avatar
By Franklin
at 2015-02-01T13:18
我再多等等其他家評測, 也許全部都打我臉 哈哈
Odelette avatar
By Odelette
at 2015-02-02T01:28
難道是Gigabyte那張特別省電?
Ursula avatar
By Ursula
at 2015-02-04T16:26
http://ppt.cc/kDzm
Enid avatar
By Enid
at 2015-02-09T02:42
guru3d 測出 < 190w http://ppt.cc/b0lL
Gilbert avatar
By Gilbert
at 2015-02-10T14:01
這裡評測，也是技嘉的 http://ppt.cc/UhAB
Dorothy avatar
By Dorothy
at 2015-02-14T03:55
跟280比沒省電多少
Leila avatar
By Leila
at 2015-02-14T06:33
from guru3D，HIS 280:172W http://ppt.cc/yPvh
Daniel avatar
By Daniel
at 2015-02-14T14:57
某一層樓打錯 318W-52W = 266W
Madame avatar
By Madame
at 2015-02-17T18:39
Eurogamer那篇是看peak power，個人覺得比較沒有參
考價值
Charlotte avatar
By Charlotte
at 2015-02-18T19:26
對了, R9 280的官方Spec: http://ppt.cc/Kgx7
Elizabeth avatar
By Elizabeth
at 2015-02-23T15:32
266W 有點誇張, 也有人在懷疑是MSI那張做壞了...
Todd Johnson avatar
By Todd Johnson
at 2015-02-26T01:30
peak power沒有參考價值?
Delia avatar
By Delia
at 2015-03-02T19:16
同環境下有CPU+RAM+SSD等等peak power當然突破200W
Hedwig avatar
By Hedwig
at 2015-03-07T11:26
而285跟280的peak power只低了不到10瓦
你要不要想辦法解釋一下呢?
Blanche avatar
By Blanche
at 2015-03-10T21:46
至於R9-280官方那張圖確定是寫錯了
Olive avatar
By Olive
at 2015-03-12T03:14
眾所皆知280是7950馬甲，7950的TDP就200W
James avatar
By James
at 2015-03-14T09:45
7950 核心 800MHz TDP 的確是 200W
Carol avatar
By Carol
at 2015-03-15T01:29
到了 7950 Boost, 提升到 925Mhz 就已經是 225W 了
Mason avatar
By Mason
at 2015-03-17T16:01
R9 280 核心 933MHz, TDP 是 250W 不合理嗎?
Jack avatar
By Jack
at 2015-03-22T07:35
Peak Power 是吃到的最大電量
Steve avatar
By Steve
at 2015-03-25T07:05
只用最大耗電要評斷一張卡的效率, 是否有點不足?
Dinah avatar
By Dinah
at 2015-03-26T14:54
http://ppt.cc/Rcqc Tom's 測出來最大耗電量290W耶
Edwina avatar
By Edwina
at 2015-03-30T03:03
超高的, 看來這張卡完全就是吃電怪獸!
Dinah avatar
By Dinah
at 2015-04-01T15:18
挖...你這麼信奉Tom's Hardware與官方圖上的數字
Catherine avatar
By Catherine
at 2015-04-04T21:32
TDP寫多少不代表它實際滿載耗電量會達到這麼高啊
Steve avatar
By Steve
at 2015-04-07T05:06
這麼挺Tom's的話，那就看看http://ppt.cc/Yk7w
Emily avatar
By Emily
at 2015-04-07T18:59
趕快幫Tom's解釋一下
Lily avatar
By Lily
at 2015-04-08T05:49
為什麼TDP寫250W，實際滿載只有約300W-100W=200W呢?
Caitlin avatar
By Caitlin
at 2015-04-09T15:08
285比起280到底有多省電呢? 就等你解釋囉~XDD
Oliver avatar
By Oliver
at 2015-04-13T01:51
怎麼轉移話題到TDP和實際滿載耗電量的差距了啊~
Damian avatar
By Damian
at 2015-04-13T04:49
繼續提出證據來打臉我 280 的 TDP 呀 XD
Tom's自己就寫了, 平均約省電40W (攤手)
Sandy avatar
By Sandy
at 2015-04-13T09:28
我也不用幫他解釋了吧!
Tom avatar
By Tom
at 2015-04-15T20:26
實際上測出的280就最高功耗頂多200w附近
這還不是打臉喔?
Dora avatar
By Dora
at 2015-04-18T18:32
這就代表你說280的250WTDP是錯的，很明顯吧XD
Hazel avatar
By Hazel
at 2015-04-20T22:03
你硬要說不是官方寫錯我也沒辦法啦 ╮(╯◇╰)╭
Damian avatar
By Damian
at 2015-04-24T22:25
打臉早就已經打得啪啪啪響了 ( ￣ c￣)y▂ξ
Susan avatar
By Susan
at 2015-04-25T00:02
上面許多評測中280平均耗電也是200W以下
Puput avatar
By Puput
at 2015-04-28T14:22
你硬要說285(190W)比起280(官方值250W?!)省電很多
Enid avatar
By Enid
at 2015-04-28T20:14
沒有實際數據佐證還能說得這麼理直氣壯的人也不多了
Harry avatar
By Harry
at 2015-04-29T23:38
佩服啊佩服~ （￣ー+￣)y-'~
Caitlin avatar
By Caitlin
at 2015-04-30T11:59
還好世界上這樣的情況不多，真是萬幸^O^
Lily avatar
By Lily
at 2015-05-05T02:51
路人路過推
Genevieve avatar
By Genevieve
at 2015-05-06T06:57
看了這幾天，說真的，某n別再爭了
Bennie avatar
By Bennie
at 2015-05-10T07:28
的確啦跟某R爭的確沒啥用 ~"~
Daniel avatar
By Daniel
at 2015-05-10T23:42
要是照你這樣講, 實測比TDP低的話就是官方是錯的
那我看很多都標錯了吧 XD
Enid avatar
By Enid
at 2015-05-12T21:25
我最初提出TDP純粹只是就官方公布數據比較
Hedda avatar
By Hedda
at 2015-05-16T15:29
TDP跟實際耗電當然有差, 跟板子設計, 時脈設定也有
影響
Susan avatar
By Susan
at 2015-05-17T20:55
我多列幾個評測, 285比280低的給您參考參考
http://ppt.cc/nCWi 大約低40W
Frederic avatar
By Frederic
at 2015-05-20T14:33
http://ppt.cc/-J-T 大約低40W
Elvira avatar
By Elvira
at 2015-05-25T10:10
http://ppt.cc/1Neg 大約低20W
Olivia avatar
By Olivia
at 2015-05-29T05:52
http://ppt.cc/NBDV 大約低20W
Elma avatar
By Elma
at 2015-05-31T15:54
加上Tom's的測試也是低約40W
我拿官方文件和7950/7950Boost規格比較證明TDP
Daniel avatar
By Daniel
at 2015-06-01T20:09
你就說是錯的, 我說Tom's測出低40W你也說他錯的
是說我再怎麼提數據佐證你也都不相信啊 XDD
Dora avatar
By Dora
at 2015-06-04T16:27
自己說280是7950馬甲也不知道兩者時脈差距
Robert avatar
By Robert
at 2015-06-08T18:34
我也是覺得怎麼說也沒用了啦唉~
Adele avatar
By Adele
at 2015-06-09T23:58
我個人是覺得 285 的核心是比 280 有效率
但是因為沒有公版設計, 這次也就是看各家各顯神通
Hedda avatar
By Hedda
at 2015-06-14T11:48
有些設計上不同或是預設超頻等, 都會造成變異
David avatar
By David
at 2015-06-14T23:33
其實最重要的是, 285逼著760和770降價啦!
Dorothy avatar
By Dorothy
at 2015-06-15T09:10
就算它是張爛卡它也爛得有價值了...
Joe avatar
By Joe
at 2015-06-19T08:37
拿著評測數據說官方TDP標錯 說測出不同結果的網站測
Anthony avatar
By Anthony
at 2015-06-20T05:41
錯 然後這樣就覺得打到別人臉很得意
Erin avatar
By Erin
at 2015-06-23T02:18
也只能還你這句還好世界上這樣的情況不多
Ursula avatar
By Ursula
at 2015-06-26T23:44
可以好好討論卻一定要搞得酸來酸去, 也真搞不懂-_-
Adele avatar
By Adele
at 2015-06-28T12:13
某n好激動...
Thomas avatar
By Thomas
at 2015-06-30T00:06
其實我的原意是
Caitlin avatar
By Caitlin
at 2015-07-02T20:25
某n別再被打臉還硬要爭了，很難看 ._.)a
Necoo avatar
By Necoo
at 2015-07-06T12:49
現在也許R大都懶得回了............
Sandy avatar
By Sandy
at 2015-07-07T09:37
ˊ_>ˋ

NVIDIA本月18日舉辦Game 24狂歡，GTX XXX

Ida avatar
By Ida
at 2014-09-03T18:12
9月18日起，NVIDIA將聯合其他廠商在全球四個地方舉辦Game 24活動，主題也很簡單，就 是慶祝PC遊戲，而且會狂歡24小時。吃喝玩樂之外，大家其實還在等待一個新東西，那就 是新一代Maxwell架構的GTX XXX/XXX顯卡。 NVIDIA控制的嚴，不能說那幾個數字，不過大家都懂得，目前的是GTX ...

機殼挑選重點

Andy avatar
By Andy
at 2014-09-03T17:53
各位前輩們好 小弟對挑選機殼方面有點疑惑 目前沒有組機的預算，但是想先瞭解一下如何挑選 1，買機殼是要主意什麼 2，如何去挑選合適的機殼 謝謝 -- Sent from my Android - ...

NZXT發表新一代神殼

Skylar Davis avatar
By Skylar Davis
at 2014-09-03T15:56
昨天在官方看到S340公開情報，官網也有實圖了 定價今天公布於2490 不過看下來還不知道整體到底是殺小 http://ppt.cc/7mu9 官網照片 重量 7.9 KG ，採用冷軋鋼處理 (有比較堅固?) 然後硬碟架...只看得出來殼上那兩個... 不知道是什麼空間 http://ppt. ...

25~30K photoshop、影音轉檔機

Zanna avatar
By Zanna
at 2014-09-03T15:35
已買/未買/已付訂金（）： 未買 預算/用途：photoshop、影音轉檔、偶而玩D3 CPU (中央處理器)：Intel 第四代 R. I7-4790 $9250 MB (主機板)：華碩 H97-PRO GAMER $3490 RAM (記憶體)：金士 ...

店員組itx機殼會不會組得瘋掉啊

Jake avatar
By Jake
at 2014-09-03T15:21
關於店員這部分，其實他們一整天的工作搞不好就是單送進來 就一台一台接著組，組完給人去測(一種生產線的概念?) 就算是新手我想應該也是一兩天下來就差不多很熟了 況且你的狀況我也懂，就是ITX受限於空間，有些一般機殼可以直接插的角度 它卻沒辦法，可能一定得轉個90度等等，可手邊又沒線材 於是就出門找線回 ...