GNOME or KDE? The Old Question Is New Today - Linux

Table of Contents

http://www.datamation.com/open-source/gnome-or-kde-the-old-question-is-new-today-1.html
GNOME or KDE? The Old Question Is New Today

(我會貼這篇 一定是作者說了 KDE 好話 XDD)

作者比較了幾個項目 不過沒有列出數據 而且大多是主觀的想法
詳細的內容 請連到原網址觀看

Performance and Memory Demands
Verdict: 1st place: Cinnamon/Mate and KDE are tied. 2nd place: GNOME 3. 3rd place: Unity.

Ease of Use
Verdict: First, Cinnamon/Mate, followed by KDE, Unity and GNOME 3 -- in that order.
I use mobile devices, but I've never reconciled myself to their finicky interfaces.

The Desktop Design Philosophy
Verdict: With its skill at innovating while preserving tradition, KDE easily takes first place.
Cinnamon/Mate's welcomes incremental changes at best, but its popularity wins second place.
The last position is a tie between GNOME 3 and Unity, which are intellectually interesting,
but often seem to display a paternalistic attitude towards users.

Application Design
Verdict: A fourway tie. Both the minimalist and maximalist approaches are admirable
in their own way, although I admit I prefer the maximalist. But since there are very
few compromises — if any — between these two extremes, I refuse to choose between them.

Unique Features
Verdict: It's no contest. KDE takes first. Trailing far behind is GNOME 3 in second,
followed by Unity in an equally distant third. Cinnamon/Mate takes fourth for participation,
as much as anything else.

--
KDE 固定聚會:每週二晚上在 Mix Coffee & Tea (與 TOSSUG 一起)
KDE Taiwan G+:https://plus.google.com/u/0/communities/114095232656344072201
KDE-TW Froum:https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/kde-tw
My Blog:http://blog.acelan.idv.tw

--

All Comments

Candice avatarCandice2013-04-17
mate是gtk2的,怎麼會跟cinnamon or kde打平手?
我是指效能方面
Megan avatarMegan2013-04-20
萬年戰文啊 ... XD
Liam avatarLiam2013-04-20
KDE比GNOME好用+1 ...但是有些軟體不要裝
Zanna avatarZanna2013-04-21
KDE 的效能不差吧
Hardy avatarHardy2013-04-24
應該說 Qt 4 之後整個效能就大躍進了
Donna avatarDonna2013-04-25
純推Gnome2 or classic
Tristan Cohan avatarTristan Cohan2013-04-27
有人測試過Qt與gtk2的效能,結果是Qt的效能比較好
http://zrusin.blogspot.tw/2006/10/benchmarks.html
Olive avatarOlive2013-05-01
不過plasma的桌面用的很不習慣 +_+
效能是一回事 windows manager又是一回事
Kumar avatarKumar2013-05-04
不過寫app來講 我實在不想用GTK寫... XD
Dinah avatarDinah2013-05-05
GTK 只是 C code 寫起來醜一點啊 XD 很適合不愛 C++ 的人
James avatarJames2013-05-07
如果沒有要考慮 MS 平台,GTK 是蠻好用的啦
Quintina avatarQuintina2013-05-09
GTK2 在 Windows 上要綁一大包 runtime,不知道 3 有沒有
比較好一點。
Christine avatarChristine2013-05-11
好像只有我是用Gnome3用爽爽的...? OAO
不過這是單就在筆電上用很爽, 桌機或大螢幕還是比較喜
Sierra Rose avatarSierra Rose2013-05-11
歡cinnamon
Una avatarUna2013-05-13
KDE是一直覺得太肥又太繁複, 敬謝不敏 orz
Joe avatarJoe2013-05-14
我愛gnome3.kde塞了一堆我用不到的東西
Odelette avatarOdelette2013-05-18
其實KDE的笨重感在Arch中看不到(分包很細
可以試試看Chakra,算是很儉約的版本
Odelette avatarOdelette2013-05-22
KDE派 +1
Tracy avatarTracy2013-05-24