GTX 970 記憶體疑似只吃得到 3.5GB - 3C

Belly avatar
By Belly
at 2015-01-24T12:08

Table of Contents

拿了6G的970M來測試
超過3.5G一樣很正常
只是問題一樣是最後400m左右就驟降
這樣到底是程式還是卡有問題呢

只是這970M到底能不能算970設計哩
回去再拿680試試看...
有人拿980測不會降的嗎?


Nai's Benchmark
Allocating Memory . . .
Chunk Size: 128 MiByte
Allocated 46 Chunks
Allocated 5888 MiByte
Benchmarking DRAM
DRAM-Bandwidth of Chunk no. 0 (0 MiByte to 128 MiByte):101.46 GByte/s
DRAM-Bandwidth of Chunk no. 1 (128 MiByte to 256 MiByte):101.46 GByte/s
DRAM-Bandwidth of Chunk no. 2 (256 MiByte to 384 MiByte):101.38 GByte/s
DRAM-Bandwidth of Chunk no. 3 (384 MiByte to 512 MiByte):101.38 GByte/s
DRAM-Bandwidth of Chunk no. 4 (512 MiByte to 640 MiByte):101.56 GByte/s
DRAM-Bandwidth of Chunk no. 5 (640 MiByte to 768 MiByte):101.45 GByte/s
DRAM-Bandwidth of Chunk no. 6 (768 MiByte to 896 MiByte):101.50 GByte/s
DRAM-Bandwidth of Chunk no. 7 (896 MiByte to 1024 MiByte):101.15 GByte/s
DRAM-Bandwidth of Chunk no. 8 (1024 MiByte to 1152 MiByte):101.67 GByte/s
DRAM-Bandwidth of Chunk no. 9 (1152 MiByte to 1280 MiByte):101.57 GByte/s
DRAM-Bandwidth of Chunk no. 10 (1280 MiByte to 1408 MiByte):101.31 GByte/s
DRAM-Bandwidth of Chunk no. 11 (1408 MiByte to 1536 MiByte):101.29 GByte/s
DRAM-Bandwidth of Chunk no. 12 (1536 MiByte to 1664 MiByte):101.56 GByte/s
DRAM-Bandwidth of Chunk no. 13 (1664 MiByte to 1792 MiByte):101.60 GByte/s
DRAM-Bandwidth of Chunk no. 14 (1792 MiByte to 1920 MiByte):101.13 GByte/s
DRAM-Bandwidth of Chunk no. 15 (1920 MiByte to 2048 MiByte):101.38 GByte/s
DRAM-Bandwidth of Chunk no. 16 (2048 MiByte to 2176 MiByte):101.46 GByte/s
DRAM-Bandwidth of Chunk no. 17 (2176 MiByte to 2304 MiByte):101.62 GByte/s
DRAM-Bandwidth of Chunk no. 18 (2304 MiByte to 2432 MiByte):101.23 GByte/s
DRAM-Bandwidth of Chunk no. 19 (2432 MiByte to 2560 MiByte):101.12 GByte/s
DRAM-Bandwidth of Chunk no. 20 (2560 MiByte to 2688 MiByte):101.76 GByte/s
DRAM-Bandwidth of Chunk no. 21 (2688 MiByte to 2816 MiByte):101.50 GByte/s
DRAM-Bandwidth of Chunk no. 22 (2816 MiByte to 2944 MiByte):101.41 GByte/s
DRAM-Bandwidth of Chunk no. 23 (2944 MiByte to 3072 MiByte):101.19 GByte/s
DRAM-Bandwidth of Chunk no. 24 (3072 MiByte to 3200 MiByte):101.47 GByte/s
DRAM-Bandwidth of Chunk no. 25 (3200 MiByte to 3328 MiByte):101.33 GByte/s
DRAM-Bandwidth of Chunk no. 26 (3328 MiByte to 3456 MiByte):101.52 GByte/s
DRAM-Bandwidth of Chunk no. 27 (3456 MiByte to 3584 MiByte):101.45 GByte/s
DRAM-Bandwidth of Chunk no. 28 (3584 MiByte to 3712 MiByte):101.31 GByte/s
DRAM-Bandwidth of Chunk no. 29 (3712 MiByte to 3840 MiByte):101.33 GByte/s
DRAM-Bandwidth of Chunk no. 30 (3840 MiByte to 3968 MiByte):101.66 GByte/s
DRAM-Bandwidth of Chunk no. 31 (3968 MiByte to 4096 MiByte):101.42 GByte/s
DRAM-Bandwidth of Chunk no. 32 (4096 MiByte to 4224 MiByte):101.35 GByte/s
DRAM-Bandwidth of Chunk no. 33 (4224 MiByte to 4352 MiByte):101.12 GByte/s
DRAM-Bandwidth of Chunk no. 34 (4352 MiByte to 4480 MiByte):101.54 GByte/s
DRAM-Bandwidth of Chunk no. 35 (4480 MiByte to 4608 MiByte):101.36 GByte/s
DRAM-Bandwidth of Chunk no. 36 (4608 MiByte to 4736 MiByte):101.17 GByte/s
DRAM-Bandwidth of Chunk no. 37 (4736 MiByte to 4864 MiByte):101.37 GByte/s
DRAM-Bandwidth of Chunk no. 38 (4864 MiByte to 4992 MiByte):101.42 GByte/s
DRAM-Bandwidth of Chunk no. 39 (4992 MiByte to 5120 MiByte):101.57 GByte/s
DRAM-Bandwidth of Chunk no. 40 (5120 MiByte to 5248 MiByte):101.20 GByte/s
DRAM-Bandwidth of Chunk no. 41 (5248 MiByte to 5376 MiByte):101.36 GByte/s
DRAM-Bandwidth of Chunk no. 42 (5376 MiByte to 5504 MiByte):15.59 GByte/s
DRAM-Bandwidth of Chunk no. 43 (5504 MiByte to 5632 MiByte):12.59 GByte/s
DRAM-Bandwidth of Chunk no. 44 (5632 MiByte to 5760 MiByte):12.60 GByte/s
DRAM-Bandwidth of Chunk no. 45 (5760 MiByte to 5888 MiByte):12.55 GByte/s
Benchmarking L2-Cache
L2-Cache-Bandwidth of Chunk no. 0 (0 MiByte to 128 MiByte):284.54 GByte/s
L2-Cache-Bandwidth of Chunk no. 1 (128 MiByte to 256 MiByte):284.61 GByte/s
L2-Cache-Bandwidth of Chunk no. 2 (256 MiByte to 384 MiByte):284.53 GByte/s
L2-Cache-Bandwidth of Chunk no. 3 (384 MiByte to 512 MiByte):284.46 GByte/s
L2-Cache-Bandwidth of Chunk no. 4 (512 MiByte to 640 MiByte):284.63 GByte/s
L2-Cache-Bandwidth of Chunk no. 5 (640 MiByte to 768 MiByte):284.60 GByte/s
L2-Cache-Bandwidth of Chunk no. 6 (768 MiByte to 896 MiByte):284.61 GByte/s
L2-Cache-Bandwidth of Chunk no. 7 (896 MiByte to 1024 MiByte):284.52 GByte/s
L2-Cache-Bandwidth of Chunk no. 8 (1024 MiByte to 1152 MiByte):284.59 GByte/s
L2-Cache-Bandwidth of Chunk no. 9 (1152 MiByte to 1280 MiByte):284.58 GByte/s
L2-Cache-Bandwidth of Chunk no. 10 (1280 MiByte to 1408 MiByte):284.62 GByte/s
L2-Cache-Bandwidth of Chunk no. 11 (1408 MiByte to 1536 MiByte):284.62 GByte/s
L2-Cache-Bandwidth of Chunk no. 12 (1536 MiByte to 1664 MiByte):284.56 GByte/s
L2-Cache-Bandwidth of Chunk no. 13 (1664 MiByte to 1792 MiByte):284.57 GByte/s
L2-Cache-Bandwidth of Chunk no. 14 (1792 MiByte to 1920 MiByte):284.54 GByte/s
L2-Cache-Bandwidth of Chunk no. 15 (1920 MiByte to 2048 MiByte):284.57 GByte/s
L2-Cache-Bandwidth of Chunk no. 16 (2048 MiByte to 2176 MiByte):284.51 GByte/s
L2-Cache-Bandwidth of Chunk no. 17 (2176 MiByte to 2304 MiByte):284.51 GByte/s
L2-Cache-Bandwidth of Chunk no. 18 (2304 MiByte to 2432 MiByte):284.57 GByte/s
L2-Cache-Bandwidth of Chunk no. 19 (2432 MiByte to 2560 MiByte):284.59 GByte/s
L2-Cache-Bandwidth of Chunk no. 20 (2560 MiByte to 2688 MiByte):284.61 GByte/s
L2-Cache-Bandwidth of Chunk no. 21 (2688 MiByte to 2816 MiByte):284.60 GByte/s
L2-Cache-Bandwidth of Chunk no. 22 (2816 MiByte to 2944 MiByte):284.54 GByte/s
L2-Cache-Bandwidth of Chunk no. 23 (2944 MiByte to 3072 MiByte):284.56 GByte/s
L2-Cache-Bandwidth of Chunk no. 24 (3072 MiByte to 3200 MiByte):284.56 GByte/s
L2-Cache-Bandwidth of Chunk no. 25 (3200 MiByte to 3328 MiByte):284.59 GByte/s
L2-Cache-Bandwidth of Chunk no. 26 (3328 MiByte to 3456 MiByte):284.55 GByte/s
L2-Cache-Bandwidth of Chunk no. 27 (3456 MiByte to 3584 MiByte):284.59 GByte/s
L2-Cache-Bandwidth of Chunk no. 28 (3584 MiByte to 3712 MiByte):284.59 GByte/s
L2-Cache-Bandwidth of Chunk no. 29 (3712 MiByte to 3840 MiByte):284.54 GByte/s
L2-Cache-Bandwidth of Chunk no. 30 (3840 MiByte to 3968 MiByte):284.60 GByte/s
L2-Cache-Bandwidth of Chunk no. 31 (3968 MiByte to 4096 MiByte):284.61 GByte/s
L2-Cache-Bandwidth of Chunk no. 32 (4096 MiByte to 4224 MiByte):284.57 GByte/s
L2-Cache-Bandwidth of Chunk no. 33 (4224 MiByte to 4352 MiByte):284.47 GByte/s
L2-Cache-Bandwidth of Chunk no. 34 (4352 MiByte to 4480 MiByte):284.52 GByte/s
L2-Cache-Bandwidth of Chunk no. 35 (4480 MiByte to 4608 MiByte):284.53 GByte/s
L2-Cache-Bandwidth of Chunk no. 36 (4608 MiByte to 4736 MiByte):284.58 GByte/s
L2-Cache-Bandwidth of Chunk no. 37 (4736 MiByte to 4864 MiByte):284.62 GByte/s
L2-Cache-Bandwidth of Chunk no. 38 (4864 MiByte to 4992 MiByte):284.55 GByte/s
L2-Cache-Bandwidth of Chunk no. 39 (4992 MiByte to 5120 MiByte):284.59 GByte/s
L2-Cache-Bandwidth of Chunk no. 40 (5120 MiByte to 5248 MiByte):284.54 GByte/s
L2-Cache-Bandwidth of Chunk no. 41 (5248 MiByte to 5376 MiByte):284.61 GByte/s
L2-Cache-Bandwidth of Chunk no. 42 (5376 MiByte to 5504 MiByte):15.77 GByte/s
L2-Cache-Bandwidth of Chunk no. 43 (5504 MiByte to 5632 MiByte):12.48 GByte/s
L2-Cache-Bandwidth of Chunk no. 44 (5632 MiByte to 5760 MiByte):12.46 GByte/s
L2-Cache-Bandwidth of Chunk no. 45 (5760 MiByte to 5888 MiByte):12.46 GByte/s
請按任意鍵繼續 . . .

--
Beowolves:你覺得是15k買一台稱三年 想換在花15k 在一台 05/31 18:28
Beowolves:還是一次三萬 這三萬的電腦 在2年後就跟垃圾一樣了 05/31 18:28
RichardHan:1366的I7也快兩年了 是垃圾嗎 05/31 18:30
Radeon:現在15K買AMD 640在I7看來還是垃圾... 05/31 18:35
RichardHan:XD 我幫樓上翻譯 05/31 18:37
RichardHan:"你要花15K買兩次垃圾 還是花30K曾經榮耀過" 05/31 18:37

--
Tags: 3C

All Comments

Lauren avatar
By Lauren
at 2015-01-28T19:21
你覺得是15k買一台稱三年 想換在花15k 在一台
還是一次三萬 這三萬的電腦 在2年後就跟垃圾一樣了
Frederica avatar
By Frederica
at 2015-01-30T20:00
1366的I7也快兩年了 是垃圾嗎
Lucy avatar
By Lucy
at 2015-01-31T22:22
現在15K買AMD 640在I7看來還是垃圾...
Hedy avatar
By Hedy
at 2015-02-02T10:47
XD 我幫樓上翻譯
"你要花15K買兩次垃圾 還是花30K曾經榮耀過"
Rebecca avatar
By Rebecca
at 2015-02-03T15:14
幾乎可以確定Nai如果繼續玩下去會被nV告到脫褲
Skylar DavisLinda avatar
By Skylar DavisLinda
at 2015-02-03T19:34
你看你的報告和我的Titan一不一樣...
表示無論是多少vRAM,會有最後幾百MB都是這種情況
Queena avatar
By Queena
at 2015-02-08T06:01
若拿Fermi的卡也有一樣情況 那應該就是程式的問題了
Puput avatar
By Puput
at 2015-02-08T21:11
看來想紅想黑的人都不少
Hamiltion avatar
By Hamiltion
at 2015-02-11T04:30
跪求該程式科普
Faithe avatar
By Faithe
at 2015-02-14T02:03
他好像有用Cuda runtime 6.5版,Fermi有完全支援嗎?
Tristan Cohan avatar
By Tristan Cohan
at 2015-02-14T08:07
我手邊剛好有一台有用GT610 2GD3,我等等去測看看
Victoria avatar
By Victoria
at 2015-02-15T08:28
不過巴哈有看到有位網友用GTX765M測試似乎沒問題
http://ppt.cc/RMNt
Hamiltion avatar
By Hamiltion
at 2015-02-19T20:01
影響商譽 只是那NAI不知道是哪國人 搞不好告不到
Suhail Hany avatar
By Suhail Hany
at 2015-02-23T15:00
GTX 765是 GK106耶, 這樣就複雜嘞
Queena avatar
By Queena
at 2015-02-26T10:34
現在幾乎每一代的卡測出來都有狀況 看來是個烏龍XD
Queena avatar
By Queena
at 2015-03-03T05:39
Nai是德國仔, 而且官方論壇目前有回應在查
Hamiltion avatar
By Hamiltion
at 2015-03-03T15:51
但是如果最後nV拒絕承認或真的沒問題..Nai
Edward Lewis avatar
By Edward Lewis
at 2015-03-07T01:28
拒絕承認會怎麼樣?像intel 15年後象徵賠個15美元嗎
Eden avatar
By Eden
at 2015-03-08T20:12
GT610測出來了,會誤判
http://i.imgur.com/sbnUi6v.png
Michael avatar
By Michael
at 2015-03-11T16:56
配備參考http://ppt.cc/np~3 文書影音機
Quintina avatar
By Quintina
at 2015-03-14T15:35
樓上XDDDD, 610好強阿, 頻寬3百萬GB/s, 果然是誤判
Rosalind avatar
By Rosalind
at 2015-03-19T08:33
那個是神器了吧……
Skylar DavisLinda avatar
By Skylar DavisLinda
at 2015-03-19T19:57
前面也有人說750Ti側了也有問題
Wallis avatar
By Wallis
at 2015-03-21T18:45
610好神 哪裡買得到? (′◎ω●‵)
Lydia avatar
By Lydia
at 2015-03-22T17:17
GT610 一台破十萬的工業伺服器標配
Kelly avatar
By Kelly
at 2015-03-25T17:15
甫一交手,發覺610之前竟是壓抑自身威能!!
Jack avatar
By Jack
at 2015-03-28T07:27
cudart64_65缺失 要怎處理?
Freda avatar
By Freda
at 2015-04-01T22:51
原載點下一行有個連結就是cudart64_65.dll
Dinah avatar
By Dinah
at 2015-04-04T04:21
早知道就買610不買970了,已哭ww
Caroline avatar
By Caroline
at 2015-04-05T03:12
樓上那我用610跟你換課以嗎
Isla avatar
By Isla
at 2015-04-06T00:47
下載完程式變成停止回應....呵呵 各種機掰
Lauren avatar
By Lauren
at 2015-04-06T12:59
樓上你有載那個dll嗎?
Harry avatar
By Harry
at 2015-04-09T15:51
喔喔,抱歉沒看到,你的顯示卡是哪張?
Lily avatar
By Lily
at 2015-04-11T06:03
就說了那個測試程式多半有問題
Doris avatar
By Doris
at 2015-04-16T05:14
停止回應爬一下文就有人遇到了 包括我
Susan avatar
By Susan
at 2015-04-20T11:26
560TI 一樣會有誤判 頻寬300萬想嚇誰阿...

關於新電腦顯卡的選擇

Faithe avatar
By Faithe
at 2015-01-24T11:56
先說結論,想買一張效能中或中上的顯卡 使用目的在於打lol不lag,同時多開網頁 爬文後在考慮GTX750,R7 260這兩張 還是有更好的建議可以給我,非常感謝 ((預算可以的話是壓在四千上下)) 可以用到更划算的價格當然更好XD 目前設備 CPU: i5 4460 RAM: 4g*2雙通道 SSD: 24 ...

技嘉GTX770 OC 4G有出湯姆克連西封面版?

Olivia avatar
By Olivia
at 2015-01-24T11:49
請問一下版上的各位版友, 技嘉的GTX770 4G OC 顯示卡有出過and#34;湯姆克連西-黑名單black listand#34;的盒裝封面版本? v2.0,也是三風扇 雙8PIN 的。 我上網查了好久都只看到770系列目前最新的是眼睛版atat 網路上只有看到760 OC 2G是湯姆克連西版本 ...

25K左右遊戲機

Olivia avatar
By Olivia
at 2015-01-24T10:55
已買/未買/已付訂金(元):未買 預算/用途:大都玩暴雪遊戲WOW D3等等.. CPU (中央處理器):Intel 第四代 R. I5-4460 MB (主機板):華碩 B85M-G RAM (記憶體):美光 Crucial 8G DDR3-1600 VGA (顯示卡):EV ...

GTX 970 記憶體疑似只吃得到 3.5GB

Necoo avatar
By Necoo
at 2015-01-24T10:28
※ 引述《wsaq1246 (Sd)》之銘言: : ※ 引述《yummypixza (好吃的披薩)》之銘言: : : 手機發文排版不便先還請見諒 : : http://neogaf.com/showthread.php?t=977645 : : 國外玩家們在最近操顯卡時發現只要遊戲吃的記憶體超過 3.5GB ...

OCZ之前倒閉的原因

Daph Bay avatar
By Daph Bay
at 2015-01-24T10:14
: OCZ自身也沒 : 有能力檢測顆粒品質的好壞(這一點唯獨原廠有能力) : 這個意思是其他間沒有自產顆粒的廠牌 : 沒有辦法去檢查自己拿到顆粒的好壞嗎? 封測廠就賺這種銀子,但產能是需要booking跟給fc的, 前台銷售不強,中段打件不及,談booking跟fc等於白搭。 : 如果是這樣 : 那麼ss ...