http://goo.gl/aOoXkY
節錄:
I ran the techradar 90-minute full HD video test on the Galaxy S7, with
screen brightness on full and the handset connected to Wi-Fi, with accounts
syncing in the background. Starting at 100%, the Exynos 8890-powered S7
dropped just 13% during the video. That left it with 87% in the tank, which
is a very impressive result. Meanwhile our US variant, running the Snapdragon
820 chip, lost 16% in the same test.
Both comfortably beat the iPhone 6S (which lost 30%), Sony Xperia Z5 (25%)
and HTC One M9 (31%).
播放90分鐘full HD video 最高亮度 連上wifi 耳機輸出 後台同步開啟
從電量100%開始8890版本S7撥放完時電量消耗了13%
美版S7(820)相同測試電量則是消耗了16%
另外iPhone 6S則是消耗30%、Sony Xperia Z5 25% 、HTC One M9 31%
結論:
8890續航>820
--
節錄:
I ran the techradar 90-minute full HD video test on the Galaxy S7, with
screen brightness on full and the handset connected to Wi-Fi, with accounts
syncing in the background. Starting at 100%, the Exynos 8890-powered S7
dropped just 13% during the video. That left it with 87% in the tank, which
is a very impressive result. Meanwhile our US variant, running the Snapdragon
820 chip, lost 16% in the same test.
Both comfortably beat the iPhone 6S (which lost 30%), Sony Xperia Z5 (25%)
and HTC One M9 (31%).
播放90分鐘full HD video 最高亮度 連上wifi 耳機輸出 後台同步開啟
從電量100%開始8890版本S7撥放完時電量消耗了13%
美版S7(820)相同測試電量則是消耗了16%
另外iPhone 6S則是消耗30%、Sony Xperia Z5 25% 、HTC One M9 31%
結論:
8890續航>820
--
All Comments