ultra plusII 240G與extreme pro480G測試 - 儲存設備

By Caitlin
at 2015-12-14T23:50
at 2015-12-14T23:50
Table of Contents
趁gohappy特價,敗了三顆ssd,兩顆是ultra plusII 240G 是老弟跟老媽要的
還有一顆是extreme pro 480G 是我要用的
先說一下,extreme pro重量比ultra plusII還重
應該是多一倍的容量,顆粒比較多的關系?
ultra plusII 240G
545讀,503寫,讀取比extreme pro快上一點點
smart資料 http://i.imgur.com/xPINGgc.jpg
HD Tune寫入測試 http://i.imgur.com/ibyeXqP.png
在1/10容量,也就是24gb的地方就掉下去了,不過速度還有200多MB/s
CrystalDiskMark http://i.imgur.com/AnYeuif.jpg
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
CrystalDiskMark 5.1.0 Shizuku Edition x64 (C) 2007-2015 hiyohiyo
Crystal Dew World : http://crystalmark.info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
* MB/s = 1,000,000 bytes/s [SATA/600 = 600,000,000 bytes/s]
* KB = 1000 bytes, KiB = 1024 bytes
Sequential Read (Q= 32,T= 1) : 524.807 MB/s
Sequential Write (Q= 32,T= 1) : 503.083 MB/s
Random Read 4KiB (Q= 32,T= 1) : 269.137 MB/s [ 65707.3 IOPS]
Random Write 4KiB (Q= 32,T= 1) : 282.324 MB/s [ 68926.8 IOPS]
Sequential Read (T= 1) : 508.539 MB/s
Sequential Write (T= 1) : 481.969 MB/s
Random Read 4KiB (Q= 1,T= 1) : 32.082 MB/s [ 7832.5 IOPS]
Random Write 4KiB (Q= 1,T= 1) : 68.833 MB/s [ 16804.9 IOPS]
Test : 1024 MiB [N: 0.0% (0.1/223.6 GiB)] (x5) [Interval=5 sec]
Date : 2015/12/14 20:45:53
OS : Windows 7 Enterprise SP1 [6.1 Build 7601] (x64)
Extrem PRO 480G
537讀524寫
先測過才抓smart資料,所以已經有寫入 http://i.imgur.com/J2oleBc.jpg
HD tune寫入測試,一條線XD http://i.imgur.com/ySU6o1k.png
CrystalDiskMark http://i.imgur.com/a7waiew.jpg
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
CrystalDiskMark 5.1.0 Shizuku Edition x64 (C) 2007-2015 hiyohiyo
Crystal Dew World : http://crystalmark.info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
* MB/s = 1,000,000 bytes/s [SATA/600 = 600,000,000 bytes/s]
* KB = 1000 bytes, KiB = 1024 bytes
Sequential Read (Q= 32,T= 1) : 536.898 MB/s
Sequential Write (Q= 32,T= 1) : 523.481 MB/s
Random Read 4KiB (Q= 32,T= 1) : 264.890 MB/s [ 64670.4 IOPS]
Random Write 4KiB (Q= 32,T= 1) : 286.598 MB/s [ 69970.2 IOPS]
Sequential Read (T= 1) : 529.806 MB/s
Sequential Write (T= 1) : 499.314 MB/s
Random Read 4KiB (Q= 1,T= 1) : 31.709 MB/s [ 7741.5 IOPS]
Random Write 4KiB (Q= 1,T= 1) : 68.952 MB/s [ 16834.0 IOPS]
Test : 1024 MiB [N: 0.0% (0.1/447.1 GiB)] (x5) [Interval=5 sec]
Date : 2015/12/14 20:19:01
OS : Windows 7 Enterprise SP1 [6.1 Build 7601] (x64)
--
鉛華洗盡,偎江感雲
--
還有一顆是extreme pro 480G 是我要用的
先說一下,extreme pro重量比ultra plusII還重
應該是多一倍的容量,顆粒比較多的關系?
ultra plusII 240G
545讀,503寫,讀取比extreme pro快上一點點
smart資料 http://i.imgur.com/xPINGgc.jpg
HD Tune寫入測試 http://i.imgur.com/ibyeXqP.png
在1/10容量,也就是24gb的地方就掉下去了,不過速度還有200多MB/s
CrystalDiskMark http://i.imgur.com/AnYeuif.jpg
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
CrystalDiskMark 5.1.0 Shizuku Edition x64 (C) 2007-2015 hiyohiyo
Crystal Dew World : http://crystalmark.info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
* MB/s = 1,000,000 bytes/s [SATA/600 = 600,000,000 bytes/s]
* KB = 1000 bytes, KiB = 1024 bytes
Sequential Read (Q= 32,T= 1) : 524.807 MB/s
Sequential Write (Q= 32,T= 1) : 503.083 MB/s
Random Read 4KiB (Q= 32,T= 1) : 269.137 MB/s [ 65707.3 IOPS]
Random Write 4KiB (Q= 32,T= 1) : 282.324 MB/s [ 68926.8 IOPS]
Sequential Read (T= 1) : 508.539 MB/s
Sequential Write (T= 1) : 481.969 MB/s
Random Read 4KiB (Q= 1,T= 1) : 32.082 MB/s [ 7832.5 IOPS]
Random Write 4KiB (Q= 1,T= 1) : 68.833 MB/s [ 16804.9 IOPS]
Test : 1024 MiB [N: 0.0% (0.1/223.6 GiB)] (x5) [Interval=5 sec]
Date : 2015/12/14 20:45:53
OS : Windows 7 Enterprise SP1 [6.1 Build 7601] (x64)
Extrem PRO 480G
537讀524寫
先測過才抓smart資料,所以已經有寫入 http://i.imgur.com/J2oleBc.jpg
HD tune寫入測試,一條線XD http://i.imgur.com/ySU6o1k.png
CrystalDiskMark http://i.imgur.com/a7waiew.jpg
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
CrystalDiskMark 5.1.0 Shizuku Edition x64 (C) 2007-2015 hiyohiyo
Crystal Dew World : http://crystalmark.info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
* MB/s = 1,000,000 bytes/s [SATA/600 = 600,000,000 bytes/s]
* KB = 1000 bytes, KiB = 1024 bytes
Sequential Read (Q= 32,T= 1) : 536.898 MB/s
Sequential Write (Q= 32,T= 1) : 523.481 MB/s
Random Read 4KiB (Q= 32,T= 1) : 264.890 MB/s [ 64670.4 IOPS]
Random Write 4KiB (Q= 32,T= 1) : 286.598 MB/s [ 69970.2 IOPS]
Sequential Read (T= 1) : 529.806 MB/s
Sequential Write (T= 1) : 499.314 MB/s
Random Read 4KiB (Q= 1,T= 1) : 31.709 MB/s [ 7741.5 IOPS]
Random Write 4KiB (Q= 1,T= 1) : 68.952 MB/s [ 16834.0 IOPS]
Test : 1024 MiB [N: 0.0% (0.1/447.1 GiB)] (x5) [Interval=5 sec]
Date : 2015/12/14 20:19:01
OS : Windows 7 Enterprise SP1 [6.1 Build 7601] (x64)
--
鉛華洗盡,偎江感雲
--
Tags:
儲存設備
All Comments

By Isabella
at 2015-12-18T14:36
at 2015-12-18T14:36

By Olivia
at 2015-12-21T12:33
at 2015-12-21T12:33

By Ivy
at 2015-12-25T12:16
at 2015-12-25T12:16

By Enid
at 2015-12-29T00:55
at 2015-12-29T00:55

By Genevieve
at 2015-12-29T15:00
at 2015-12-29T15:00

By Cara
at 2015-12-30T17:09
at 2015-12-30T17:09

By Bennie
at 2015-12-31T06:53
at 2015-12-31T06:53

By Sierra Rose
at 2016-01-02T01:25
at 2016-01-02T01:25

By Victoria
at 2016-01-04T13:52
at 2016-01-04T13:52
Related Posts
如果你看上seagate快換,請謹慎考慮

By Rebecca
at 2015-12-14T22:04
at 2015-12-14T22:04
如果你看上seagate快換,請謹慎考慮

By Megan
at 2015-12-14T21:45
at 2015-12-14T21:45
如果你看上seagate快換,請謹慎考慮

By George
at 2015-12-14T21:14
at 2015-12-14T21:14
5.9TB硬碟只搜到1.54TB

By Oliver
at 2015-12-14T21:00
at 2015-12-14T21:00
TOSHIBA 3.5吋 2TB 7200RPM $1991

By Hedy
at 2015-12-14T10:21
at 2015-12-14T10:21