新款 MacBook Air 效能打敗 MacBook Pro - MAC

→ MrDisgrace:不知道項目和權重 07/21 23:18
推 darKyle:不知道項目和權重+1 MBA只是disk IO快 CPU絕不可能贏MBP 07/21 23:23

網頁有寫

Geekbench scores are calibrated against a baseline score of 1000,
which is the score of a single-processor PowerMac G5 @ 1.6GHz.
Higher scores are better.
If you're curious how your Mac (or PC!) compares,
you can download Geekbench and run it on your system.

Finally, Geekbench 2 only measures processor and memory performance
which means systems with similar processors but different
graphics cards (such as some MacBooks and MacBook Pros)
will have similar scores.

也就是主要僅參考CPU和Memory的performance，Disk I/O和Graphic不列入計算，
也就是說新版的MBA和2010版的MBP，以這個測試來說，
CPU效能在伯仲之間，略勝出一些些(換個benchmark結果可能又不一樣)
BTW，benchmark只是一個指標而已，參考一下無傷大雅，適合自己就好。


節錄幾個重要的分數

Model 64bit 32bit Comment
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Mac Pro (Mid 2010) 24262 21754 榜首參考用
...
iMac (27-inch Mid 2011) i7-2600 3.4G 12851 11648 訂製款(感謝n大提醒)
MacBook Pro (17-inch Early 2011) 2.3G 12651 10364
MacBook Pro (15-inch Early 2011) 2.3G 11166 10326
MacBook Pro (17-inch Early 2011) 2.2G 10853 10004
MacBook Pro (15-inch Early 2011) 2.2G 10823 9991
MacBook Pro (15-inch Early 2011) 2.0G 9518 8786
iMac (27-inch Mid 2011) 3.1G 8878 8357 非訂製款高階iMac
MacBook Pro (13-inch Early 2011) 2.3G 6448 6867
MacBook Air (13-inch Mid 2011) 1.7G 5860
MacBook Pro (17-inch Early 2010) 2.8G 6403 5837
MacBook Pro (15-inch Early 2010) 2.6G 6277 5566
MacBook Pro (17-inch Early 2010) 2.6G 6273 5564
MacBook Air (11-inch Mid 2011) 1.6G 5040
MacBook Pro (15-inch Early 2010) 2.5G 5730 4989
MacBook Pro (15-inch Early 2010) 2.4G 5529 4878
MacBook Air (13-inch Late 2010) 2.1G 3292 3008
MacBook Air (13-inch Late 2010) 1.8G 2958 2681
...


我個人是覺得這些分數看起來有差但用起來沒什麼差異就是了，
就像一個3000公尺跑20分，一個跑10分，
走在路上一起逛街基本上還是一樣快....


另外，不知道有沒有人願意看看安裝LION前後的差異 XDD
--

我達達的引擎聲是個美麗的錯誤
我不是歸人
是個台客

--