iOS降頻的第五個class action - iOS

http://www.patentlyapple.com/patently-apple/2017/12/apple-hammered-with-class-action-5-for-slowing-iphone-battery-issue.html

In the modern digital age, batteries "wear" over time.
The lithium-ion battery used by Apple slowly diminishes its
ability to hold a charge with time and use. However, normal
lithium-ion battery wear does not reduce performance;
a weakening battery has no effect on performance unless
there is software that links the two. And that is precisely
what Apple did.

In rolling out iOS 10.2.1, Apple claimed to "bug fixes and
improve [ ] the security of [the] iPhone or iPad" and "improve
[ ] power management during peak workloads to avoid
unexpected shutdowns on the iPhone."

What Apple purposefully failed to disclose, however, was
that the update would act as a latent time-bomb that
slowly eroded the phone's performance to the frustration
of the user – the software update throttled the handset's
performance.

==========

蘋果因為降頻而被告的第五個class action

理由:

電池本身就會隨著時間損耗 但是電池本身耗損跟性能並沒有關係

除非有軟體將兩者掛勾 然而這正是蘋果所做的事

蘋果並未告知這次的軟體更新將用電池耗損來逐漸殺死手機的性能

====

加州也準備好了



--