使用GPU加速 - 顯卡

By Carol
at 2009-07-29T18:10
at 2009-07-29T18:10
Table of Contents
請問有使用過CUDA的大大
最近剛在使用
把程式改成4個thread的平行化
但是程式卻慢百倍!!!
按照道理說如果改4個thread
若扣掉搬資料的時間
理應還是會比原來程式快一些
這個不知道是為何會慢那麼多??
感謝指教!!!
--
=====================原來程式碼改的地方=========================
for (j = 0; j < BLOCK_SIZE; j++)
{
memcpy(&m5[0],&img->cof[i0][j0][j][0], BLOCK_SIZE * sizeof(int));
m7 = &(img->m7[j][0]);
m6[0] = m5[0] + m5[2];
m6[1] = m5[0] - m5[2];
m6[2] = (m5[1] >> 1) - m5[3];
m6[3] = m5[1] + (m5[3] >> 1);
m7[0] = m6[0] + m6[3];
m7[1] = m6[1] + m6[2];
m7[2] = m6[1] - m6[2];
m7[3] = m6[0] - m6[3];
}
for (i = 0; i < BLOCK_SIZE; i++)
{
ipos = i + ioff;
m5[0]=img->m7[0][i];
m5[1]=img->m7[1][i];
m5[2]=img->m7[2][i];
m5[3]=img->m7[3][i];
m6[0] = m5[0] + m5[2];
m6[1] = m5[0] - m5[2];
m6[2] = (m5[1] >> 1) - m5[3];
m6[3] = m5[1] + (m5[3] >> 1);
}
===============================改成kernal===================
__global__ void idctcuda_h(int *dev_A,int *dev_B)
{
int id=threadIdx.x;
dev_B[id*4+0]=dev_A[id*4+0] +dev_A[id*4+2];
dev_B[id*4+1]=dev_A[id*4+0] -dev_A[id*4+2];
dev_B[id*4+2]=(dev_A[id*4+1])>>1-dev_A[id*4+3];
dev_B[id*4+3]=dev_A[id*4+1] +(dev_A[id*4+3])>>1;
dev_A[0*4+id]=dev_B[id*4+0]+dev_B[id*4+3];
dev_A[1*4+id]=dev_B[id*4+1]+dev_B[id*4+2];
dev_A[2*4+id]=dev_B[id*4+1]-dev_B[id*4+2];
dev_A[3*4+id]=dev_B[id*4+0]-dev_B[id*4+3];
__syncthreads();
}
__global__ void idctcuda_v(int *dev_A,int *dev_B)
{
int id=threadIdx.x;
dev_B[id*4+0]=dev_A[id*4+0] +dev_A[id*4+2];
dev_B[id*4+1]=dev_A[id*4+0] -dev_A[id*4+2];
dev_B[id*4+2]=(dev_A[id*4+1])>>1-dev_A[id*4+3];
dev_B[id*4+3]=dev_A[id*4+1] +(dev_A[id*4+3])>>1;
dev_A[0*4+id]=dev_B[id*4+0]+dev_B[id*4+3];
dev_A[1*4+id]=dev_B[id*4+1]+dev_B[id*4+2];
dev_A[2*4+id]=dev_B[id*4+1]-dev_B[id*4+2];
dev_A[3*4+id]=dev_B[id*4+0]-dev_B[id*4+3];
__syncthreads();
}
__global__ void idctcuda_h(int *dev_A,int *dev_B)
{
int id=threadIdx.x;
dev_B[id*4+0]=dev_A[id*4+0] +dev_A[id*4+2];
dev_B[id*4+1]=dev_A[id*4+0] -dev_A[id*4+2];
dev_B[id*4+2]=(dev_A[id*4+1])>>1-dev_A[id*4+3];
dev_B[id*4+3]=dev_A[id*4+1] +(dev_A[id*4+3])>>1;
dev_A[0*4+id]=dev_B[id*4+0]+dev_B[id*4+3];
dev_A[1*4+id]=dev_B[id*4+1]+dev_B[id*4+2];
dev_A[2*4+id]=dev_B[id*4+1]-dev_B[id*4+2];
dev_A[3*4+id]=dev_B[id*4+0]-dev_B[id*4+3];
__syncthreads();
}
__global__ void idctcuda_v(int *dev_A,int *dev_B)
{
int id=threadIdx.x;
dev_B[id*4+0]=dev_A[id*4+0] +dev_A[id*4+2];
dev_B[id*4+1]=dev_A[id*4+0] -dev_A[id*4+2];
dev_B[id*4+2]=(dev_A[id*4+1])>>1-dev_A[id*4+3];
dev_B[id*4+3]=dev_A[id*4+1] +(dev_A[id*4+3])>>1;
dev_A[0*4+id]=dev_B[id*4+0]+dev_B[id*4+3];
dev_A[1*4+id]=dev_B[id*4+1]+dev_B[id*4+2];
dev_A[2*4+id]=dev_B[id*4+1]-dev_B[id*4+2];
dev_A[3*4+id]=dev_B[id*4+0]-dev_B[id*4+3];
__syncthreads();
}
void itranscuda(int *regist)
{
int data_size = 16*sizeof(int);
int *dev_A ,*dev_B;
int i;
cudaMalloc( (void**)&dev_A, data_size );
cudaMalloc( (void**)&dev_B, data_size );
cudaMemcpy( dev_A, img, data_size, cudaMemcpyHostToDevice );
//dim3 dimblock(2,2);
//dim3 dimgrid(w/dimblock.x,h/dimblock.y);
idctcuda_h<<<1,4 >>>( dev_A,dev_B);
idctcuda_v<<<1,4 >>>( dev_A,dev_B);
cudaMemcpy( regist, dev_A, data_size, cudaMemcpyDeviceToHost );
cudaFree(dev_A);
}
--
最近剛在使用
把程式改成4個thread的平行化
但是程式卻慢百倍!!!
按照道理說如果改4個thread
若扣掉搬資料的時間
理應還是會比原來程式快一些
這個不知道是為何會慢那麼多??
感謝指教!!!
--
=====================原來程式碼改的地方=========================
for (j = 0; j < BLOCK_SIZE; j++)
{
memcpy(&m5[0],&img->cof[i0][j0][j][0], BLOCK_SIZE * sizeof(int));
m7 = &(img->m7[j][0]);
m6[0] = m5[0] + m5[2];
m6[1] = m5[0] - m5[2];
m6[2] = (m5[1] >> 1) - m5[3];
m6[3] = m5[1] + (m5[3] >> 1);
m7[0] = m6[0] + m6[3];
m7[1] = m6[1] + m6[2];
m7[2] = m6[1] - m6[2];
m7[3] = m6[0] - m6[3];
}
for (i = 0; i < BLOCK_SIZE; i++)
{
ipos = i + ioff;
m5[0]=img->m7[0][i];
m5[1]=img->m7[1][i];
m5[2]=img->m7[2][i];
m5[3]=img->m7[3][i];
m6[0] = m5[0] + m5[2];
m6[1] = m5[0] - m5[2];
m6[2] = (m5[1] >> 1) - m5[3];
m6[3] = m5[1] + (m5[3] >> 1);
}
===============================改成kernal===================
__global__ void idctcuda_h(int *dev_A,int *dev_B)
{
int id=threadIdx.x;
dev_B[id*4+0]=dev_A[id*4+0] +dev_A[id*4+2];
dev_B[id*4+1]=dev_A[id*4+0] -dev_A[id*4+2];
dev_B[id*4+2]=(dev_A[id*4+1])>>1-dev_A[id*4+3];
dev_B[id*4+3]=dev_A[id*4+1] +(dev_A[id*4+3])>>1;
dev_A[0*4+id]=dev_B[id*4+0]+dev_B[id*4+3];
dev_A[1*4+id]=dev_B[id*4+1]+dev_B[id*4+2];
dev_A[2*4+id]=dev_B[id*4+1]-dev_B[id*4+2];
dev_A[3*4+id]=dev_B[id*4+0]-dev_B[id*4+3];
__syncthreads();
}
__global__ void idctcuda_v(int *dev_A,int *dev_B)
{
int id=threadIdx.x;
dev_B[id*4+0]=dev_A[id*4+0] +dev_A[id*4+2];
dev_B[id*4+1]=dev_A[id*4+0] -dev_A[id*4+2];
dev_B[id*4+2]=(dev_A[id*4+1])>>1-dev_A[id*4+3];
dev_B[id*4+3]=dev_A[id*4+1] +(dev_A[id*4+3])>>1;
dev_A[0*4+id]=dev_B[id*4+0]+dev_B[id*4+3];
dev_A[1*4+id]=dev_B[id*4+1]+dev_B[id*4+2];
dev_A[2*4+id]=dev_B[id*4+1]-dev_B[id*4+2];
dev_A[3*4+id]=dev_B[id*4+0]-dev_B[id*4+3];
__syncthreads();
}
__global__ void idctcuda_h(int *dev_A,int *dev_B)
{
int id=threadIdx.x;
dev_B[id*4+0]=dev_A[id*4+0] +dev_A[id*4+2];
dev_B[id*4+1]=dev_A[id*4+0] -dev_A[id*4+2];
dev_B[id*4+2]=(dev_A[id*4+1])>>1-dev_A[id*4+3];
dev_B[id*4+3]=dev_A[id*4+1] +(dev_A[id*4+3])>>1;
dev_A[0*4+id]=dev_B[id*4+0]+dev_B[id*4+3];
dev_A[1*4+id]=dev_B[id*4+1]+dev_B[id*4+2];
dev_A[2*4+id]=dev_B[id*4+1]-dev_B[id*4+2];
dev_A[3*4+id]=dev_B[id*4+0]-dev_B[id*4+3];
__syncthreads();
}
__global__ void idctcuda_v(int *dev_A,int *dev_B)
{
int id=threadIdx.x;
dev_B[id*4+0]=dev_A[id*4+0] +dev_A[id*4+2];
dev_B[id*4+1]=dev_A[id*4+0] -dev_A[id*4+2];
dev_B[id*4+2]=(dev_A[id*4+1])>>1-dev_A[id*4+3];
dev_B[id*4+3]=dev_A[id*4+1] +(dev_A[id*4+3])>>1;
dev_A[0*4+id]=dev_B[id*4+0]+dev_B[id*4+3];
dev_A[1*4+id]=dev_B[id*4+1]+dev_B[id*4+2];
dev_A[2*4+id]=dev_B[id*4+1]-dev_B[id*4+2];
dev_A[3*4+id]=dev_B[id*4+0]-dev_B[id*4+3];
__syncthreads();
}
void itranscuda(int *regist)
{
int data_size = 16*sizeof(int);
int *dev_A ,*dev_B;
int i;
cudaMalloc( (void**)&dev_A, data_size );
cudaMalloc( (void**)&dev_B, data_size );
cudaMemcpy( dev_A, img, data_size, cudaMemcpyHostToDevice );
//dim3 dimblock(2,2);
//dim3 dimgrid(w/dimblock.x,h/dimblock.y);
idctcuda_h<<<1,4 >>>( dev_A,dev_B);
idctcuda_v<<<1,4 >>>( dev_A,dev_B);
cudaMemcpy( regist, dev_A, data_size, cudaMemcpyDeviceToHost );
cudaFree(dev_A);
}
--
Tags:
顯卡
All Comments

By Donna
at 2009-07-30T23:08
at 2009-07-30T23:08

By Edward Lewis
at 2009-07-31T00:24
at 2009-07-31T00:24

By Leila
at 2009-08-01T22:50
at 2009-08-01T22:50

By Bethany
at 2009-08-02T16:56
at 2009-08-02T16:56
Related Posts
MSI 4890和 N260GTX Lightning 1792M DDR3

By Bethany
at 2009-07-29T16:11
at 2009-07-29T16:11
想換新顯卡。

By Queena
at 2009-07-29T15:58
at 2009-07-29T15:58
請問這是顯卡的問題嗎?

By Yedda
at 2009-07-29T15:44
at 2009-07-29T15:44
關於顯示卡與DirectX9.0c的問題??

By Skylar DavisLinda
at 2009-07-29T15:01
at 2009-07-29T15:01
請問,該選擇微星4890,還是青雲4890?

By Daph Bay
at 2009-07-29T14:40
at 2009-07-29T14:40